Comparison of Students' Mathematical Communication Ability Between Think Pair Share and Numbered Head Together Cooperative Learning Model
Abstract
This study aimed to find out the comparison between students' mathematical communication ability taught by Think Pair Share and Numbered Head Together cooperative learning model. The population in the study were all students in grade X MAN 2 Model Medan. The sample were all students of class X-C with 37 students as experimental class I and class X-H with 36 students as experimental class II, which were selected through random sampling technique. The experimental class I was taught by Think Pair Share cooperative learning model while the experimental class II with Numbered Head Together cooperative learning model. This research was quasi experimental with posttest only control group design. Data collection instrument used was mathematics communication ability test that have been tested for validity and reliability. Before testing the hypothesis, normality test was carried out using Shapiro-Wilk test and homogeinity test using Levene test on the research data. The results showed that the samples came from normal and homogeneous distributed population. Hypothesis testing with t-test show that (2,4 > 1,666). Thus is rejected and is accepted, so students’ mathematical communication ability taught by Think Pair Share cooperative learning model is better than the students’ mathematical communication ability taught by Numbered Head Together cooperative learning model.
Keywords: Mathematical Communication, Think Pair Share, Numbered Head TogetherKeywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Asmara, Riska, and Ekasatya Aldila Afriansyah. “Perbedaan Peningkatan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa antara Model Eliciting Activities dan Discovery Learning.” Suska Journal of Mathematics Education 4, no. 2 (November 30, 2018). https://doi.org/10.24014/sjme.v4i2.5714.
Ginting, Ria Renata, Egi Verbina Ginting, Roudhotul Jannah Hasibuan, and Laurensia Masri Perangin-angin. “Analisis Faktor Tidak Meratanya Pendidikan Di SDN 0704 Sungai Korang.” Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia 3, no. 04 (June 15, 2022). https://doi.org/10.59141/japendi.v3i04.778.
Isrok’atun, and Amelia Rosmala. Model-Model Pembelajaran Matematika. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2018.
Martha, Wida Kusuma Dewi, and Nuraeni Reni. “Kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa SMP ditinjau dari self-efficacy pada materi perbandingan di Desa Karangpawitan.” Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 2, no. 1 (March 31, 2022). https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v2i1.1586.
Maulyda, M. A. Paradigma Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis NCTM. Malang: IRDH, 2020.
Nugraha, Tonnie Hari, and Heni Pujiastuti. “Analisis Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Berdasarkan Perbedaan Gender.” Edumatica : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 9, no. 1 (June 11, 2019). https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v9i1.5880.
Qohar, Abdul, and Utari Sumarmo. “Improving Mathematical Communication Ability and Self Regulation Learning Of Yunior High Students by Using Reciprocal Teaching.” Journal on Mathematics Education 4, no. 1 (2013). https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.4.1.562.59-74.
Riyanti, Rindu, and Dian Mardiani. “Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Antara Model Pembelajaran Course Review Horay Dan STAD.” Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 1 (March 31, 2021). https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v1i1.1031.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61590/int.v2i01.107
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Jl. Norman Umar No. 117 Rt. 7 Kelurahan Kebun Sari Kecamatan Amuntai Tengah Kabupaten Hulu Sungai Utara Kode Pos 71415. Email: integrasijurnal@gmail.com

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
View My Stats

